Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Fernando A. Riofrío
Full-Text PDF XML 735 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5313/2019.01.002
Affiliation(s)
Independent Researcher, Piura, Peru
ABSTRACT
This
research represents another of the various different versions of the
Hylomorphism of the third millennium (some closer and some less close to the
thought of Aristotle). Its aim is to find the most profound and basic intrinsic
explanation of the being of the sense-perceptible substance, by means of a
systematic approach to the theory of substance developed in the central books
of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. The
theory of substance is based on the hylomorphic conception of the sense-perceptible
substance, and reaches its culmination in Chapter 17 of Metaphysics Book Zeta,
where Aristotle develops the definitive deeper argument that demonstrates the
essence of substance. The argument is developed through a rigorous analysis of
the sense-perceptible thing and its elements during the existence of the thing
and after its corruption. The result obtained by this analysis is that none of
the material components of a sense-perceptible thing, nor the sum of all of
them, explain the constitution of the sense-perceptible thing, or its nature.
And the final conclusion is that there exists an entity distinct from all of
the material components, which is the arrangement and the essence of the
sense-perceptible thing, that is, its form. The form also emerges as the
primary cause of the being of the sense-perceptible thing and the primary substance,
because it acts as the cause of matter and of the hylomorphic compound, and
possesses the characters of substantiality in the maximum degree, being
separate (τὸ χωριστὸν) and being “a this” (τὸ τόδε τι). To take another angle, the soul is the form of biological
organisms and man; and this investigation ends by establishing how the
Aristotelian argument applies to a biological organism, and demonstrates that
the soul is the first cause of this and the primary substance, by means of the
distinction of the proximate matter and remote matter of the living being.
KEYWORDS
primary substance, definition of substance, form, matter, Hylomorphism, becoming, cause, Aristotle
Cite this paper
References