 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Feasibility of Measuring Reading Ability by the Format of Short Answer Questions
ZHOU Qingyan
Full-Text PDF
XML 273 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8080/2019.01.001
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
In recent years, Bachman’s model of the Communicative Language Ability has become increasingly popular. The theories about the measurement of test usefulness put forward by him have aroused great interest and been adopted in the design and evaluation of language tests. Test usefulness incorporates six desirable qualities: validity, reliability, authenticity, interactiveness, impact, and practicality. They constitute an organic system, one quality interacting with another. The test developers’ main task is to find an optimal balance among them so as to guarantee the usefulness of language tests. The Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) format is probably the only choice that test developers would like to turn to in their construction of reading tests. Its reliable scoring and efficient administration had once made people regard it as the only feasible as well as practical test format. However, it arouses, with the advancement of language testing theories, more and more skepticism among experts in this field. This paper sets out to propose a new test format—Short Answer Questions (SAQs)—for reading tests. The author chose some non-English majors from Shanghai University for Science and Technology as the subjects and made comparison between the two test formats—MCQs and SAQs—that appeared in their mid-term examination. By means of quantitative and qualitative measures, the author studied the formats in terms of their validity, reliability, interactiveness, practicality, and their impact. Conclusions are drawn and tentative suggestions provided in the hope that the problems with MCQs might be overcome, thus putting forward one more choice for the reform of CET (College English Test for non-English majors)-4/6 that has been put on its agenda.
SAQs (Short Answer Questions), MCQs (Multiple Choice Questions), validity, reliability, interactiveness, practicality, impact
Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, B. J. (1980). Testing communicative performance: An interim study. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.
Carroll, B. J., & Hall, P. J. (1985). Making your own language tests. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Clark, J. L. D. (1983). Language testing: Past and current status-directions for the future. Modern Language Journal, 67, 431-443.
Davies, A. (1990). Principles of language testing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Han, B. C. (2000). The Statistical Approach in Foreign Language Teaching and Research. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1980). How to increase reading ability. New York: Longman.
Hayes, B. L. (1991). Effective strategies for teaching reading. MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Heaton, J. B. (1975). Writing English language tests. London: Longman.
Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English language tests. London: Longman.
Henning, G. (1987). A guide to language testing. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Hughes, A. (2000). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, R. (1978). On the construct validation of comprehension tests: An exercise in applied linguistics (Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Queensland).
Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman.
Li, G. Y. (1994). The English Teaching Methodology with Chinese Characteristics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Nuttall, C. (2002). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school. London: Longman.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ventry, I. M., & Schiavetti, N. (1980). Evaluating research in speech pathology and audiology. NJ: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
Weir, C. J. (1988). Communicative language testing. Great Britain: University of Exeter.
Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding & developing language tests. London: Prentice Hall International.
Weir, C. J. (2000). Studies in Language Testing 12: An empirical investigation of the componentiality of L2 reading in reading for academic purposes. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Zou, S. (1998). The English Language Testing. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.