Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Netserreab Ghebremichael Andom
Full-Text PDF XML 524 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2177/2018.10.002
Affiliation(s)
Centre for Economic, Legal and Social Studies (CEDEJ), Khartoum, Sudan
ABSTRACT
Irregular
cross-/trans-national mobility has increasingly become one of the most talked
about subjects in the public domain so much in the press, among academics,
policy-makers, and parliamentarians. The level of irregular out-migration of
people from Eritrea to neighboring and far off countries has drastically risen
and remains unabated since the eruption of the second Ethio-Eritrean war
(1998-2000). With an estimated 400 to 5,000 Eritreans reportedly fleeing either
to Sudan or Ethiopia, Eritrea has been dubbed as the “fastest emptying country”.
Using methodological triangulation and cross-national field work conducted both
in Sudan and Eritrea, this article unravels the principal factors behind the
country’s disproportionate youth emigration arte. It aims to illuminate whether
post-2000 Eritrea’s massive irregular youth “exodus” reflects its political or
economic woes. It also tangentially touches on whether any rigorous analysis
about such “phenomenal” irregular youth efflux from a country who prides itself
of considering its biggest asset as nothing, but its human resources should
heed to regional and international politico-economic factors into the equation
under scrutiny. The center of such inquiry lies debunking the
tautology of the simpleton of narratives advanced, on the one hand, by migrant
“exporting” government authorities and by rights groups and most researchers,
on the other hand. The paper ultimately discusses the politically
sensitive nature of labelling contemporary Eritrean migrants: Are they all
refugees, economic migrants, or something else?
KEYWORDS
Multiple uncertainties; national service; structural unemployment; irregular migration; refugee regime; prima facie refugees; migrants’ agency; mixed migrants/ hybrid refugees
Cite this paper
References