Property Valuation Challenges for Properties Condemned for Environmental Public Upgrades

No property may be taken for public use without just compensation. The issue is what is “just compensation” and how it is determined in a particular circumstance. Regardless of the type of valuation, the Greek Constitution (Article 17, paragraphs 2-5) clearly forbids estimation based on possible future projections. In this way, future externalities, positive or negative, deriving from the change of use are not incorporated. This contravenes the Pareto optimal resource distribution and even challenges the Caldor-Hicks compensation criterion, especially in cases of partial takings. We suggest valuation to include a best-case and a worst-case scenario for possible future values. A combination of them, e.g., the average, will be used to determine benefits and costs and the final level of compensation. The most important externality under consideration, especially in cases of land properties condemned for public large-scale constructions, such as environmental public utilities, should be the environmental effect. The internalisation of possible negative externalities should be internalised by the construction benefactor.

Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). The value of clean water: The public’s willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resources Research, 29(7), 2445-2454.

Flad, H. K. (1997). Country clutter: Visual pollution and the rural roadscape. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 533, 123-125.

Hochman, O., & Ofek, H. (1979). A theory of the behavior of municipal governments: The case of internalizing pollution externalities. Journal of Urban Economics, 6(4), 416-431.

Karadimitriou, N. (2013). Planning policy, sustainability and housebuilder practices: the move into (and out of?) the redevelopment of previously developed land. Progress in Planning, 82, 1-41.

Klauer, S. G., Dingus, T. A., Neale, V. L., Sudweeks, J. D., & Ramsey, D. J (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car Naturalistic Driving Study data. Report DOT HS 810 594, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington DC, USA.

Lee, S. E., McElheny, M. J., & Gibbons, R. (2007). Driver performance and digital billboards: Final report prepared for the Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Center for Automotive Safety Research, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Loures, L. (2015). Post-industrial landscapes as drivers for urban redevelopment: Public versus expert perspectives towards the benefits and barriers of the reuse of post-industrial sites in urban areas. Habitat International. Special Issue: Exploratory Spatial Analysis of Urban Habitats, 45(2), 72-81.

McWilliams, A. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480-1495.