[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Valery Tsimmerman
Full-Text PDF XML 822 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7375/2018.03.002
Unlike other groups of elements, Group 3 constituency remains unsettled. This article argues that ground level microstates and atomic number parity suggest Sc-Y-Lu-Lr Group 3 membership.
Transition metals, inner transition elements, lawrencium placement, rare earth metals, group 3 constituents, ground level, atomic microstates, atomic number, parity, f-block.
[1] Mole, B. 2015. “Debate Continues over 103’s Place in Periodic Table.” Science News (May 16): 6-7.
[2] Jensen, W. 1982. “The Positions of Lanthanum (Actinium) and Lutetium (Lawrencium) in the Periodic Table.” J. Chem. Ed. 59: 634-6.
[3] Jensen, W. 2015: “The Positions of Lanthanum (Actinium) and Lutetium (Lawrencium) in the Periodic Table: An Update.” Foundations of Chemistry 17: 23-31.
[4] Sato, T. K., Stora, T., et al. 2016. “First Ionization Potential of the Heaviest Actinide Lawrencium, Element 103.” European Physical Journal Web of Conferences 131: 05001.
[5] Sato, T. K., Asai, M., et al. 2015. “Measurement of the First Ionization Potential of Lawrencium, Element 103.” Nature 520: 209-11.
[6] Miessler, G., and Tarr, D. 1991. Inorganic Chemistry. Prentice Hall.
[7] Dragoset, R. A., Musgrove, A., Clark, C. W., Martin, W. C., and Olsen, K. 2017. “Atomic Properties of the Elements.” National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Physical Measurement Laboratory. Accessed at www.nist.gov/pml/periodic-table-elements 14 June 2018 as “NIST SP 966 February 2017.”
[8] Emsley, J. 2000. The Elements. Oxford University Press.