Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Leshan Normal University, Sichuan, China

ABSTRACT

Classroom teaching interaction has been the research topic these years. This paper focuses on student-student interaction based on empirical studies of classroom interaction, including questionnaires, interviews, and lesson observations, finding that there are some pair work activities, but there are few group work activities in senior high English teaching in Western China for some reasons, such as large classes, exam-oriented education, etc. This research also suggests some communicative activities for teachers to adopt, such as jigsaw, information gap, topic discussion, debate, using group work in reading, peer writing conference, etc., aiming to cultivate students’ collaborative learning and co-operative awareness. Teachers will change their teaching ideas and adopt flexible methods to increase students’ talk time, using group work activities according to students’ needs. By doing this, teachers can arouse students’ motivation to learn and improve teaching and learning efficiency, and the goal is to promote their personal whole development.

KEYWORDS

strategies, senior English teaching in Western China, student-student interaction, activities

Cite this paper

References

Bonny. N., & Locastro, V. (2012). Teaching English to large classes: Large classes and student learning. TESOL QUATELY, 1(4).

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principle: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Borokhovskia, E., Tamim, R., Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., & Sokolovskaya, A. (2012). Are contextual and designed student-student interaction treatments equally effective in distance education? Distance Education, 11(3), 311-329.

Harmer, J. (2000). How to teach English.. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Harmer, J. (2001).  The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1984). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson, K. E. (2000). Understanding communication in second language classrooms. Beijing: Foreign language Teaching and Research Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New york: Longman.

Locastro, V. (1989). Large size classes: The situation in Japan. Lancester Leeds Language Learning in Large Classes Research Project Report No. 5. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED322758

Mitnik, R.,Recabarren, M.,Nussbaum, M.,& Soto, A. (2009). Collaborative robotic instruction: A graph teaching experience. Computers & Education, 53(2),330-342.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.010

Rivers, W. M. (2000). Interactive language teaching. Beijing: Foreign language Teaching and Research Press.

Scrivener. J. (2002). Learning teaching: A guidebook for English Language teachers. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]