 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
On the “Productivity” of Contemporary Literary Criticism
JIANG Ji-hua
Full-Text PDF
XML 540 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2018.11.006
Yancheng Institute of Technology, Jiangsu, China
The “Productivity” of literary criticism refers to the composition of the literary organization that constitutes the text and its contradictions and deficiencies in the reading activities, and actively explores the meaning of the text, and discovers what is not spoken in the text, and separates the meaning of the text, that is, criticism is an interpretation of practice and productive behavior. Since the 20th century, Althusser, Macherey, Jameson, and Eagleton have revealed the complex relationship between text form and ideology and social history, aiming at clarifying the process of text structure participating in the entire literary production. The creativity and constructiveness of productive criticism is also in line with the trend of contemporary literary criticism from textual criticism to cultural criticism. The reason why criticism is productive is that it can roughly seek the reasons for its existence from the aspects of linguistics, reception aesthetics and paradigm.
productivity, literary criticism, text production
Barthes, R. (2000). S/Z (Y. X. Tu, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
Belsey, C. (1993). Critical practice (Y. M. Hu, Trans.). Beijing: China Social Science Press.
Eagleton, T. (1976). Criticism and ideology: A study in Marxist literary theory. London: Verso.
Eagleton, T. (1980). Marxism and literary criticism (Wenbao, Trans.). Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.
Jameson. (1999). The political unconscious (F. Z. Wang etc., Trans.). Beijing: China Social Science Press.
Macherey, P. (1978). A theory of literary production. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.