Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Chie I. Yamada
Full-Text PDF XML 439 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2134/2018.06.004
Affiliation(s)
Public, Place, Plurality Institute, Tokyo, Japan
ABSTRACT
Institutional development and the substantial governance outcomes have continued to be a big theme in
Political Science. This paper focuses on partnership practices in public works
construction and decision-making cases in city and urban settings (as a
socio-political environment). In these settings, the management of policy regarding
space and time should conduct on understandings of the various dimensions of
institutional settings. We are going to emphasize institution and coordination
in the public policy process. So, this paper attempted to describe chronological
restrictions that were generated by long-term interactions and institutional
transformation’s patterns from a
historical institutional view. As much as possible, we have analyzed the
following micro-institutional experiments, participatory governance (Case I)
and public works executions (Cases II and III)
to show the institutional development patterns precisely.
KEYWORDS
city (urban setting) and policy, institution and coordination, institutional development and resilience, partnership in participatory governance
Cite this paper
References