Contact us
 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Zharama Llarena
Full-Text PDF
XML 628 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2018.02.003
Affiliation(s)
California Southern University, California, USA
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the author
aims to respond to the legal issues of procedural torts for violation of
contracts and obligations in seek of quantification of damages. The universal
civil rights entail several law topics and issues for civil cases pertaining to
various measures for people, its human relations, obligations, and contracts
corresponding to torts. Moral damages are qualitative issues being legally
raised for indemnification of relevant ethical issues pertaining to behavior
and reputation. Intentional and negligent torts through committed acts or
omission may expose the suffered client at risk of emotional harm. Anger is an
emotional trauma experienced by a person inflicted with external harm, such as
discovered fraud and experienced injustice by an individual. Its management can
exhibit the degree of trauma felt by a person. In this paper, means to measure
the symptoms of aggressiveness brought by a series of recall by the individual
is exhibited. Cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) was a tool used to
mitigate post-traumatic symptoms brought by exposure risk to emotional harm. A
33-year-old Asian man had experienced moral injury to the extent of losing
significant weight in a span of eight months resulting from being obese to a
normal body mass index (BMI) as a result of his anger management. Exponential
Injury Severity Score (EISS) in reference to Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)
system showed that the 33-year-old Asian man had suffered severe injury with a
score of 5.29 near to a 6.0 maximal score. Thus, the inflicted moral injury was
exhibited to be severe, hence necessary compensatory damages should be provided
to the plaintiff.
KEYWORDS
human rights, human capabilities, torts, damages
Cite this paper
References