 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Linguistic Capital as Foreign Dominations in Tourism Domain: A Case in Seminyak-Bali
Made Budiarsa, Yohanes Kristianto
Full-Text PDF
XML 933 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2169/2018.08.005
Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
The focus of this paper is the practice of using linguistic symbols in tourism. The locus is in Seminyak Bali tourism area. The purpose of this paper is to: (1) identify the forms of linguistic symbols as capital practiced in tourism; (2) pattern the linguistic dominance over people (tourists) and economy; and (3) describe the legitimacy of linguistic dominance. This paper uses a transdisciplinary perspective, namely social studies and linguistics to analyze the linguistic dominancy in tourism. The research method used is qualitative method. Research data are lingual symbols (words and vocabulary) collected by survey, interview, and documentary study. Data are analyzed descriptively with the concept of symbolic capital (Bourdieu) and duality of structure (Giddens). Research data indicate that the existence of language symbols has shifted from local character to global character. Language symbols as a representation of foreign capital in the streets of Seminyak Bali as a phenomenon of foreign capital domination practice in the realm of tourism. The results found: (1) forms of linguistic capital (foreign investors); (2) forms of linguistic domination of people (tourists) and the economy (goods); and (3) the legitimacy of linguistic capital.
linguistic capital, dominance, tourism domain, structure, landscape
Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, July-Aug. 2018, Vol. 6, No. 4, 201-209 doi: 10.17265/2328-2169/2018.08.005
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Language and symbolic power. In A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (p. 480).
London/New York: Routledge.
Budiarsa, M., Simpen, I. W., Dhanawaty, N. M., & Kristianto, Y. (2015). Linguaculture Sebagai Identitas Pariwisata Bali
(Linguaculture as Bali tourism identity). Research Report Research Group, Udayana University.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkley: University of California Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Priyono, B. H. (2016). Anthony Giddens: Suatu Pengantar (Anthony Giddens: An introduction). Jakarta: Popular Library of
Gramedia.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Methods and miscellaneous language analysis techniques. Introduction to linguistic research. Yogyakarta:
Sanata Dharma University Publisher.
Sugiyono. (2010). Qualitative-quantitative research methods and R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanto, P. C., Erfiani, N. M. D., & Hartika, L. D. (2015). Paradox of hotel brand names in Bali: divergence between naming
trends and consumer perception. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283720373
Wijana, D. P. (2014). Language, power, and resistance: Study about names business entity special region DI Yogyakarta.
Humaniora, 26(1), 56-64. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v26i1.4700
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design & methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.