Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Public-Private Partnership Model Used in the Taipei Central Station Project Research
Author(s)
Mou-Chung Tseng, Chien-Wen Peng
Full-Text PDF XML 595 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5542/2018.07.005
Affiliation(s)
National Taipei University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
ABSTRACT
In view of the lack of
financial aid and the migration of industries, the role of local governments
shifted from social reproduction to development and production, which made the
development of the local economy their main responsibility. The local governments
hence have to face challenges in their management in regards to the arising
changes and needs. This Taipei Central Bus Station Build Operate Transfer (BOT)
project of urban formation and development is not only a trend in countries
around the globe; it is also an area the Taiwanese governments are actively
involved in. With the impact of urbanization, the size of highly functional
cities has surpassed core city administrative regions; therefore, this has
generated various planning, administrative and policy issues. This study
examines the public-private partnership (PPP) views on urban development; the research methodology will
be designed to focus on qualitative research, the following conclusions were
made: (1) The basic goal of
global city competitiveness of Taipei was promoted by implementing “qlubarnization”, a spatial
development strategy dependent on intercalary abilities. (2) Taipei is located in
the hub of Asia, linking mainland China and Taiwan, facing the world, peaceful
and stable, rich and diverse in culture, such that adopting the “hybrid or
mixed-use development model” will allow “the national gate of the country program—Central Station,
Central Park” to become an
international city brand. (3) Taking the “Taipei Main Station PPPs model
development of the Taipei Central Bus Station BOT project of nine precincts
specific land development projects” as a key success indicator, the government
took privatization or PPP into consideration, loosened the monopoly on urban
infrastructure, created infrastructure services and a maintenance market,
positioned the city as a “supranational” entity in terms of capital flow, and
sought a coherent land policy.
KEYWORDS
public-private partnership, urban development, globalization, sustainable development
Cite this paper
References