 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Possible Philosophical Dissolutions of Language Understanding Uncertainty in Interpreting
REN Rui, ZHANG Le-le
Full-Text PDF
XML 506 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8080/2018.05.007
Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
Language understanding in interpreting is inextricable for any interpreter. It is inextricable and essential for an interpreter to tackle this thorny problem on his or her way to a successful interpreting task. For interpreters, untranslatability or uncertainty in language understanding is nightmare. Philosophically, people are tortured by that I know where I-ache. I-ache is the support for private language. Private language is one thing that results in uncertainty in language understanding and uncertainty or untranslatability in interpreting. There is psychological basis or motivation to dissolve the problem. They are public language and mitsein. Public language is late Wittgenstein’s concept, while the latter comes from Heidegger.
philosophical dissolutions, language understanding, uncertainty
Gadamer. (1994). Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Translated by Xia Zhenping, Song Jianping. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 3.
Heidegger, M. (1974). Preface [M]. Through phenomenology to thought. W. J. Richardson, (Ed.). Hague: The Hague.
Heidegger. (1987). Being and time [M]. Translated by Chen Jiaying, Wang Qingjie. Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore.
Jia,W. Z. (2000). Why Language is the Home of Existence? [J]. Changbai Journal.
Tu, J. L. (2007). A Study of Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy: An Introduction to British and American Philosophy of Language [M]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations [M]. New York: Macmillan.