Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Guangdong University of Foreign Studies South China Business College, Guangzhou, China

ABSTRACT

Based on the overall view of communication theory and spoken English language testing system, this paper has conducted a comprehensive and specific observation and research on how examiner non-verbal behavior has affected candidate performance. The research has found out that not only examiner behavior including non-verbal behavior but language testing scenario itself is of communicative nature and examiner’s non-verbal behavior indeed promotes examinee’s test performance, which can help to better understand spoken testing system, examiner non-verbal behavior, and testing environment to promote the development of language speaking test and reflect examinee’s real language competence and ability.

KEYWORDS

English spoken test, examiner, non-verbal behavior, communicative nature

Cite this paper

References
Bi, J. (1993). The effect of research on non-verbal intercultural communication on foreign language teaching. Chinese Language Learning, 3, 37-43.
Bi, J. (1998). Non-verbal behavior in intercultural communication. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in Pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing, 26(3), 341-366. 
Buck, C. (1989). The ACTFL OPI: Teseter training manual. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.
Hall, E. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday & Company Inc. 
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (1997). Non-verbal communication in human interaction (4th ed.). Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publisher. 
Lazaraton, A. (1996). Interlocutor support in oral proficiency interview: The case of case. Language Testing, 13, 151-172. 
Liu, R., & Han, B. (1999). Language testing and its methods. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Malandro, L. A., & Barker, L. (1989). Non-verbal communication. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc. 
Morris, D. (1994). Bodytalk. London: Jonathan Cape. 
O’Loughlin, K. (2001). The equivalence of direct and semi-direct speaking tests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Plough, I., & Bogart, P. (2008). Perceptions of examiner behavior modulate power relations in oral performance testing. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(5), 195-217.
Ross, R. S. (1974). Speech communication: Fundamentals and practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Sabatelli, R., & Rubin, M. (1986). Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 120-133. 
Saigh, P. (1980). The effects of positive non-verbal examiner comments on the WISC-R performance of Americans in Lebanon. The Journal of Psychology, 104(2), 165-169. 
Samovar, L., Porter, R., & Stefani, L. (1998). Communication between cultures. Marceline, Missouri: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Wen, Q. (1999). Testing and teaching spoken English. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yammiyavar, P., Clemmensen, T., & Kumar, J. (2008). Influence of cultural background on non-verbal communication in a usability testing situation. International Journal of Design, 2(2), 31-40.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]