Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Jaime Carlos Macuácua and Almeida Sitoe
Full-Text PDF XML 743 Views
DOI:10.17265/2162-5298/2017.09.002
Affiliation(s)
Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo 257, Mozambique
ABSTRACT
Global political forums
on climate have identified deforestation and forest degradation actions as the main
sources of atmospheric emissions. Therefore, its reduction is basically the main
international agenda. The objectives of environmental policy seem to prevail conflicting,
between the global, which aims to stabilize emissions with sequestration of forest
carbon and local poverty reduction. REDD+ (Reducing
Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) is
considered cheap proposal for mitigation and adaptation to climate changes. Thus,
Mozambique is preparing for accessing to forest carbon financing. The study analyzed
interaction of policies and measures in the national and local strategy of REDD+
in Mozambique and resorted three methodological procedures, review of previous study,
interviews and seminars, in a non-probabilistic sampling. Conflicting visions among
nations hinder consensus on reducing emissions and REDD+ aims to replace the KP
(Kyoto Protocol). National strategy of REDD+ should suggest measures and policies
to reduce deforestation in key sectors contributing to emissions. Interviewees suggested
technological approach (30%), agrarian reform (26%), institutional reform (21%)
and decentralization (20%). Therefore, 77.3% supported technological use to increase
production and productivity and for the forest sector, 86.4% supported forest concessions.
They also highlighted conservation agriculture, SAFs (Agroforestry Systems), energy accessibility and mining licensing. However, REDD+ is being projected
from the global to the local, but the debate must extrapolate negotiations restricted
to government participation, as well as policy options and incentives to generate
co-benefits that address local community priorities.
KEYWORDS
REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation), policies, outcomes, climate compatible development.
Cite this paper
References