[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Kenneth Lee
Full-Text PDF XML 1169 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2017.12.017
California State University, Northridge, USA
Many of those involved in the ecological movement have found inspiration and parallels within the Buddhist tradition. The Buddhist philosophy of karmic causality and dependent origination (pratitya-samutpada) convey the notion of interdependence of humans and nature. Today, especially in the United States, there are many movements, such as the Buddhist Peace Fellowship, to promote eco-living and sustainable communities, which call for humans to be mindful of the environment and make conscientious choices for the benefit of all sentient beings and non-sentient entities. Just as humans have been the cause of the gradual deterioration of Nature, we can also be the solution towards an eco-conscious living, which not only fosters a healthy environment, but also enables us to build good merit. The core Buddhist teaching, which must be embraced by all eco-minded practitioners is the notion of interdependence, which has been expounded by notable Japanese Buddhist figures in the eighth century, such as Kukai (774-835) of the Shingon School and Dogen (1200-1253) of the Soto Zen sect, who both viewed that non-living life forms—trees, plants, and the earth—could also achieve enlightenment. Their view is based on the ontological notions of Buddha-nature (tathagata-garbha) and Indra’s Jewel Net, which is a powerful image found in Huayen’s (Jpn. Kegon) Avatamsaka Sutra. This paper examines Buddhist teachings and sutras, which support eco-friendly and sustainable movements in our society and world today.
mindfulness, Buddhism, nature, environment, dependent origination, Eco-living, Indra’s Net
Kara, S. & Kraft, K. (Eds.). (2000). Dharma rain: Sources of Buddhist environmentalism. Boston: Shambala.
Singer, P. (1989). All animals are equal. Animal rights and human obligations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Snyder, G. (2010). How much is enough?: Buddhism, consumerism, and the human environment. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.
Swearer, D. (2006). An assessment of Buddhist eco-philosophy. Harvard Theological Review, 99, 123-137. doi:10.1017/S0017816006001179
Taylor, P. (2003, October 20). The moral stance on ethical vitalism. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from http://www.academon.com/argumentative-essay/the-moral-stance-on-ethical-vitalism-32698/
Tucker, M., & Williams, D. (1998). Buddhism and ecology: The interconnection of Dharma and deeds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.