Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

West University of Timisora, Timisora, Romania

ABSTRACT

This study examined the process of leading a pedagogic change in the junior high school in the village of Majd al-Kroom in Northern Israel. The school adopted an educational initiative called “Walkthrough” which is a comprehensive internal evaluating tool operated in the school by the faculty. The tool includes focused regular observations within a defined period to examine a particular issue determined by the school. The research question was: How is the Walking Through as pedagogical tool perceived by the faculty and the school’s management? To receive an answer to this question, the researcher had conducted a qualitative study based on teachers’ interviews. The research findings suggested the following: School principal is a key personality in the implementation of any change. School principal is perceived as a pedagogic leader seeking ways to improve teachers’ functioning. The aim of the “Walking Through” initiative is to improve the teaching quality by experiencing success. The “Walking Through” has direct and indirect influence on the organizational culture; objectivity, collegiality, cooperation, support, feedback, and assessment become part of the school’s discourse. The main research conclusion is that school principals thrive to reach organizational and pedagogic excellence and gain experience via this school’s experience.

KEYWORDS

walkthrough, peers assessment, school principal as leading changes

Cite this paper

Journal of US-China Public Administration, March 2017, Vol. 14, No. 3, 123-135

References

Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523-549.

Dominick, P. G., Reilly, R. R., & McGourty, J. W. (1997). The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior. Group and Organization Management, 22(4), 508-520.

Duke, D. (2010). The key to sustain successful school changes. Jerusalem: Avney Rosha Inst.

Guttmann, T. (2012). Tse Ulmad (Walkthrough). Jerusalem: Avney Rosha Inst.

Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2010). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 49-54.

Heifetz, R. A., & Lewinski, M. (2007). Leadership test. Yediot Aharonot, Tel-Aviv.

Hen, D. (2007). Experimental schools: The source for educational innovation. Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv.

Isoré, M. (2009). Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Paper No. 23.

Katz, I. (2011). Leadership in the eye of the storm. Retrieved from http://psychology.huji.ac.il/upload/articles/IsraelKatz.pdf

Levitski, N. (2010). Theory building process based on a narrative research. In L. Kesen and M. Krumer-Nevo (Eds.), Analysis of qualitative data (pp. 383-412). Beer Sheva: Ben Gurion University Publication.

Mckinsey Report. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. Retrieved from http://alamin99. wordpress.com/2008/02/22/mckinsey-report

Michaeli, N., & Fisher, G. (2010). Change and improvement in education systems. An anthology of articles. Jerusalem: Branco Weiss Institute and Avney Rasha Institute.

Muijs, D., & Lindsay, G. (2008). Where are we at? An empirical study of levels and methods of evaluating continuing professional development. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 195-211.

Oreg, S., & Berzon, Y. (2013). Pedagogic leadership in Israel, evaluation and backing of pupils’ achievements. Jerusalem: Avney Rosha Inst.

Rom, A. (2008). Internal assessment and teacher’s self assessment. MUTAV Kaet, issue no. 1.

Sanji, P. (1995). The learning organization. Portland, Oregon: Productivity Press.

Sclafani, S. (2009). Evaluating and rewarding the quality of teachers: International practices. Paris: OECD Publications.

Zariski, A. (1996). Student peer assessment in tertiary education: Promise, perils and practice. In J. Abbott and L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Teaching and learning within and across disciplines (pp. 189-200). Perth: Murdoch University.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]