[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
LIU Xu-liang
Full-Text PDF XML 793 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8072/2017.04.010
China Youth University of Political Studies, Beijing, China
Referring to the well established foreign language proficiency evaluation scale frameworks such as the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) in Europe and ILR (The Interagency Language Roundtable) scale in the United States, Chinese language education authority is dedicating great efforts to the contruction of the Chinese targeted and tailored national proficiency evaluation system. This initiative will tremendously subvert the traditional language learning and testing mechanism, bring phenomenal transformations and innovations to the future language learning and teaching approaches and methodologies, and meanwhile impose great influence on the language concerning administration and profession.
China’s foreign language proficiency evaluation scale, history and milestones, foresights, expectations and implications, key problems
Council of Europe. (2011). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Modern language division. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.
JIANG, G. (2016). Implementing suggestions on deepening the reform of examination and enrolment system and steadily advancing the national assessment system of foreign language proficiency. China Examination, 1, 3-6. .
LIN, H. Q. (2015). Deepening the examination and enrollment system reform and strengthening the construction of national foreign language competence evaluation system. China Examination, 1, 3-6. .
LIU X. L. (2016). A linguistic perspective of EU’s rethinking education program and its implications. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(8), 657-662.
North, B. (2000). The development of a common reference scale of language proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.