Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

ABSTRACT

In Milton’s Paradise Lost, Satan is conspicuously depicted as the “mighty chief” (I 566) and “the dread commander” (I 589) of the rebel army. True to the Hebrew meaning of his name, Satan poses appropriately as a grand “Adversary” (I 629; II 282) to “wage by force or guile eternal war” (I 121) against God. The poet has deliberately built up a parallel between Satan and Christ the Son, who is the commander-in-chief of the angelic army. With “Almighty arms / Gird on, and Sword upon [his] puissant Thigh” (VI 713-14), the Son certainly makes an impressive figure of warrior-general. Satan’s stance as the “idol of majesty divine” is really extraordinary. During the War in Heaven, he does show superhuman courage and strength; his ability to change his bodily form has no doubt increased his potential as a warrior. Furthermore, he commands a highly disciplined army, surpassing by far the best troops in human history. All this seems to indicate Satan as a great hero. Even before God proclaims the Son to be raised “by merit” to the position of “second omnipotence” (III 309), Milton has already made it clear to the reader that Satan, too, is “by merit rais’d / To that bad eminence” (II 5-6). This ambivalent merit of Satan has incurred heated controversy among the critics. The present paper will set out to analyze the encounter between Satan and the Son in Paradise Lost, in an effort to determine the true meaning of heroism.

KEYWORDS

Satan, Christ, John Milton, Paradise Lost, heroism, pagan warrior, Christian virtues, literary tradition

Cite this paper

References
Bede. (1954). The ecclesiastical history of the English nation. London: J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd.
Broadbent, J. B. (1960). Some graver subject: An essay on Paradise Lost. London: Barnes & Noble. 
Evans, J. M. (1968). Paradise Lost and the Genesis tradition. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Fletcher, R. (Ed.). (1896). The prose works of John Milton. London: Henry G. Bohn.
Freeman, J. A. (1980). Milton and the martial Muse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hill, C. (1979). Milton and the English revolution. London: Penguin Books.
Hughes, M. H. (Ed.). (1985). John Milton: Complete poems and major prose. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Smith, J. C., & De Selincourt, E. (Eds.). (1966). Spenser: Poetical works. London: Oxford University Press.
Steadman, J. M. (1968). Milton’s epic characters. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
Swanton, M. (1987). English literature before Chaucer. London: Longman.
Taylor, G. C. (1934). Milton’s use of Du Bartas. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Woodhouse, A. S. P. (1972). The heavenly Muse: A preface to Milton. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]