 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Linguistic Regularities of LOLspeak
Beata Bury; Adam Wojtaszek
Full-Text PDF
XML 1227 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8072/2017.01.005
Philological School of Higher Education, Wrocław, Poland; University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
The influence of the Internet on language is an unprecedented phenomenon. Maybe only the emergence of the systems of writing and the invention of printing can be claimed to have contributed more to the way language is used and perceived. Numerous publications have been devoted to the new forms of language thriving in the cyberspace. The present study focuses on one of the countless micro-genres which we may encounter while surfing the web: the LOLspeak. Its major peculiarity lies in the deliberate departure from the standard conventions related to grammar and orthography. At first sight, this new code of communication could puzzle and put off an average user, but upon closer inspection it turns out that there is some order in this apparent chaos and that there are certain limits to the deviations applied by ardent followers of LOLspeak. Our major aim was to propose a preliminary list of certain regularities characterizing this new form of linguistic creativity. It is by no means exhaustive, as the investigation is based on a relatively small corpus, but it suggests a certain direction for the future investigation of this very interesting phenomenon.
LOLspeak, linguistic deviation, Internet language, linguistic innovativeness
Calka, M. (2011). Language and ritual in Cheezland: The creation and maintenance of community in “I can has cheezburger” (Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University).
Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language play. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danet, B. (2001). Cyberplay: Communicating online. Oxford: Berg.
Dash, A. (2007). Cats can has grammar. In A blog on making a culture (April 23, 2007). Retrieved February 4, 2016 from http://anildash.com/2007/04/cats-can-has-gr.html
De los Santos, E. A. (2012). LOLcats and LOLspeak: The importance of the Internet culture for English professionals. Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 3(1), 62-76.
Eckert, P. (2003). The meaning of style. Proceedings of the eleventh annual symposium about language and society—Austin. Texas Linguistic Forum, 47, 41-53.
Gawne, L., & Vaughan, J. (2012). I can haz language play: The construction of language and identity in LOLspeak. In M. P. L. Dao & M. Bowler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd ALS Conference—2011 (pp. 97-122). Canberra: Australian National University.
Herring, S. (2012). Special Internet language varieties: Culture, creativity & language change. Paper presented at The II LETiSS Workshop Language Go Web: Standard and Nonstandard Languages on the Internet (April 4-5, 2012).
Holm, J. (2011). An introduction into pidgin and creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens. A study of the play-element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Lefler, J. (2011). I can has thesis?: A linguistic analysis of LOLspeak (Unpublished M.A. thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2270&context=gradschool_theses
Liberman, M. (2007). Kitty pidgin and asymmetrical tail-wags. In Language log (April 25, 2007). Retrieved February 4, 2016 from http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004442.html
Miltner, K. (2011). Srsly phenomenal: An investigation into the appeal of LOLcats. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
North, S. (2007). “The voices, the voices”: Creativity in online conversation. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 538-555.
Rosen, A. (2010). Iz in ur meme aminalizintehlangwich: A linguistic study of LOLcat. Verge, 7, 1-12.
Sebba, M. (2003). Spelling rebellion. In J. Androutsopoulos and A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), Discourse constructions of youth identities (pp. 151-172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. London: Penguin.
Wojtaszek, A. (2007). Informatyczna e-wolucj@ języka w przestrzeni wirtualnej (IT e-volution of l@nguage in cyperspace). In A. Łyda (Ed.), Przestrzenie języka (Dimensions of language) (pp. 151-170). Katowice: Wydawnictwo WSZMiJO.